DELIRIUM CIRCULAR
read CIRCLE PD Guard Sanframondi
For several days the local club of the Democratic Party (which should be democratic for the time being remains written in italics) seek in any way to pass a democratic rule that is ...... • I quote each elected candidate shall sign a commitment to abandon the ethical-political position in mid-term if during the third year in office has the agreement did not (40%?) of the reference bodies of PD; in words simple and without work around the problem you want each elected to bring their brains in storage. This will trample the art. 67 of the Italian Constitution, which requires that every person elected candidate when he performs his duties without a binding mandate.
This is because the election takes place in a competition in which all candidates are presented to the community and ask for trust.
If this is the Italian constitution is not clear why an elected must give an account to a body of reference and party receive at least 40% of the consensus to continue the term.
On this there is to say that already in the previous legislature was set up a control room and / or committee which sat in the warranty people that had nothing to do with the party, but this stuff is now gone we will discuss later.
But back to the basic question I ask myself? Why a
elected by the people must account to the party organs and instead reference all the people who receive the office of the party shall not give account to anyone, even in the party really does not even know who they are and in which bodies are included.
I think it is more democratic and fair that those who hold posts just because the party has indicated so without popular consent, aware of the action.
In this regard it is perhaps the case that Democrats face clarity about who holds or has held positions as the party making the public and the names that any positions (would be too much to ask to know even those who have decided).
We are waiting for answers.
0 comments:
Post a Comment